Submit your details. Access is reviewed and sent to your email within 24 hours. No payment required.
Maybe laterNot a notes website. Not a generic question bank. A cognitive training system built on clinical experience, real cases, and structured OSCE-style decision-making β anchored to current ESHRE guidelines and evidence-based practice.
Same concept Β· 5 angles Β· Subconscious encoding
PICO framework Β· ESHRE benchmarking Β· Real cases
Adversarial probing Β· Multi-station viva preparation
8-week cohort Β· Error loop Β· Thinking architect
The Broader Vision
Built for the full international OBG subspecialty ladder. EFRM first β because that is where the gap is greatest and the need most urgent.
Basic sciences. The written gateway to postgraduate OBG training.
Coming Q4 2026Applied clinical knowledge. ESHRE guidelines begin to dominate.
Coming 2027Communication, clinical skills, structured viva.
Coming 2027European subspecialty in Reproductive Medicine. The rarest credential in international IVF practice.
Full platform β live nowGynaecological oncology, sexual health, genital surgery.
RoadmapCore Innovation
One concept. Five clinical angles. Different language every time. Not pattern recognition β subconscious encoding. The exam rotates vantage points deliberately. So does this system.
When a mock uses the same wording, same demographics, same diagnostic structure β your brain switches from concept retrieval to pattern recognition. Mock scores inflate. Exam performance drops. You see "PCOS + AMH 8 + IVF" and click antagonist protocol without thinking. That is recall, not reasoning.
Secreted by granulosa cells of small antral follicles. Reflects the recruitable pool β not total primordial reserve.
AMH 0.7 + AFC 4 = POSEIDON Group 3. Antagonist protocol, dual trigger β translating a number into a decision.
When AMH appears as a primary outcome in an RCT β is it patient-relevant or a surrogate?
Endometrioma cystectomy vs ablation β differential AMH impact. When does FP need to happen before surgery?
Reverse reasoning. Patients with discordant AMH/AFC, prior ovarian surgery, or premature luteinisation may not follow the standard prediction curve. The exam tests boundaries, not centres.
The principle: One concept β five stations, five reasoning frameworks. A candidate who memorised "AMH = ovarian reserve" fails Vantages 3, 4, and 5. The goal is not 90%+ mock scores. The goal is decision stability under pressure β when the question looks unfamiliar but the concept is not.
The EFRM does not reward memory alone. It rewards knowledge applied through structured reasoning β the ability to work through unfamiliar clinical presentations, anchor every decision to current evidence, acknowledge uncertainty correctly, and defend a plan under adversarial examination. That is what this system trains.
IVF Specialist. Precision Fertility, Sikar. One of the few Indian clinicians to hold dual European board-level credentials in both OBG and Reproductive Medicine simultaneously.
The Story
When I decided to sit EFRM Part 1, I searched for dedicated preparation resources. There were none. Not a single platform, course, or structured guide built specifically for the EFRM examination.
I had to build my own system β 800+ questions, 7 domain-specific modules, a daily mock architecture, error notebooks, and a mentality framework. I sat the exam on March 20, 2026. Both papers passed.
Then I built this platform so no future candidate has to start from scratch the way I did. This is the resource I wish had existed.
There were no dedicated EFRM preparation resources when I began. No structured question bank. No platform designed around the exam's actual format. Everything had to be built from first principles.
The system that emerged β 800+ questions, 7 domain modules, a daily mock architecture, and an error notebook β was built for one purpose: to pass the exam. It worked. Then it became this platform.
EFRM Part 2 OSCE: 4 July 2026, ExCeL London. Every clinical case seen in practice is documented here as OSCE material β in real time, before the result is known.
Official EFRM Part 1 Results β March 20, 2026
This is the honest data. The weakest domain is shown, not hidden. This is why the error notebook system exists β and why Reproductive Endocrinology gets full dedicated coverage. The preparation method works even from weak starting positions.
Credential Stack
European Board and College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Β· Both parts passed Β· Lisbon, January 2026
ESHRE/EBCOG Fellowship Examination in Reproductive Medicine Β· Paper 1: 75.29% Β· Paper 2: 68.97%
ExCeL London Β· Preparing in real time Β· Cases documented as they happen
ESI-PGIMSR, New Delhi Β· GGSIPU Β· 2021
FMF Certified Β· ESHRE Member Β· FMAS Β· DMAS Β· Advanced Hysteroscopy Β· 350+ ART cycles
β οΈ FAIL ONE STATION β FAIL THE EXAM. No compensation between stations.
Critical Distinction
ATCRM Syllabus 2024 β 7 Stations
Your IVF background gives natural strength in 3 stations. Stations 2 and 7 need the most dedicated work. No station can be left to chance.
PCOS, POI, thyroid, prolactin, amenorrhoea. Every answer anchored to ESHRE thresholds.
Dedicated StudyPrecocious/delayed puberty, MΓΌllerian anomalies, adolescent menstrual disorders, DSD. Least IVF-adjacent β first principles required.
Priority FixPGT, chromosomal mosaicism, Gardner grading, Istanbul Consensus β your daily clinical language.
StrengthEctopic, miscarriage, RIF, RPL β every threshold from ESHRE and NICE. Clinical nuance separates borderline from pass.
Dedicated StudyYour home ground. IVF protocols, OHSS, stimulation individualisation β translate daily experience into structured viva answers.
StrengthOncofertility, BRCA counselling, transgender FP, surgical thresholds. Your cycles provide the narrative.
StrengthNot "what did this study show" β but "should this change your practice, and why?" The hidden differentiator. Most candidates underestimate this station.
High StakesResearch LiteracyDaily Practice β 17:30β18:00
Not a role-play. A viva practice session. The self-interrogation step is what most candidates skip β and what the examiner will do to you.
Silent reading. Core question, key data, red flags. Do not speak yet.
7-step algorithm. Every answer must contain "According to ESHRE guidelinesβ¦"
Act as examiner. "Why not option B?" Β· "What if AMH was 0.5?" Β· "What does ESHRE say exactly?"
Look up ESHRE guideline. Compare point-by-point. Every gap drives the next session.
RCT, cohort, case-control, SR? Appropriate for the question?
Well-defined? Generalisable to your patients?
Patient-relevant or surrogate? Pre-specified?
P-value vs CI? Absolute vs relative risk? NNT?
Selection, performance, detection, attrition?
Should this change practice? What would need to be true?
Always close Station 7 with: "Based on the methodological limitations β specifically [name 1β2] β I would not change my clinical practice yet. I would be more persuaded by a [multicentre RCT / larger sample / longer follow-up]."
2 papers Β· 45Q each Β· Paper 1: 25 SBA + 20 EMQ Β· Paper 2: 25 SBA + 20 EMQ Β· No mid-section answers. No domain can be left unprepared.
ATCRM Syllabus 2024 β 7 Core Domains
Each domain shows 5 sample questions from the actual preparation bank. Click to reveal the answer. The full bank β 800+ questions, 1-page high-yield sheets, error notebook, mock papers β unlocks on registration.
Full Question Bank β Launching Q4 2026
800+ questions Β· 7 domain modules Β· 1-page high-yield sheets Β· Personal error notebook Β· Mock papers. Next Part 1 sitting: March 2027.
Each case is built around a clinical scenario, a common decision error any clinician might make, and the guideline-specified correct reasoning pathway. Not a case diary β a cognitive training module.
Case architecture: Each case is built as a clinical trigger β common pitfall any clinician might make β examiner challenge β guideline-specified correct reasoning. Not a case diary. A cognitive training module designed to reveal the exact decision traps the EFRM OSCE tests.
Most mentorships dump content and solve doubts. This cohort builds a clinical reasoning system β the cognitive infrastructure to pass the EFRM and practise at subspecialist level.
Doubt solving Β· Notes sharing Β· Casual WhatsApp guidance Β· Content dumping Β· Teaching facts one by one Β· Solving questions after the fact
Structured clinical mentorship pathway Β· Correcting thinking patterns Β· Simplifying decision-making Β· Translating concepts into clinical logic Β· Building reasoning architecture
Weekly Template β Fixed Structure
Foundation topic with structured guide. Output: What you must KNOW. Anchored to ESHRE guideline.
Real-world scenarios. Protocol selection. Decision pathways. Concept becomes clinical action.
15β25 SBA/EMQs per week. Same concept, multiple angles, different language. No dΓ©jΓ vu β deliberate.
You submit mistakes and confusions. Pattern correction. Thinking error identification. Error notebook activated.
8-Week Programme
EFRM system overview. Vantage-Point System introduction. How to study β not what to read.
AMH, AFC, FSH threshold, POSEIDON classification. Poor vs normal vs high responder.
Antagonist vs agonist. hCG vs GnRHa vs dual trigger. OHSS prevention hierarchy. Freeze-all decision.
Fertilisation, blastocyst development, Gardner grading, vitrification, PGT. Istanbul Consensus criteria.
IUI vs IVF vs ICSI indications. FET protocol selection. Luteal phase support evidence base.
Endometrial receptivity, RIF definition and workup. Adjuncts β evidence vs hype. RPL investigations.
Complete mock β all 7 stations. Timed viva. Adversarial probing on every answer.
Error notebook deep review. Weak area targeting. Concept inversion questions. Readiness assessment.